Rattan Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The Full Bench disposed of a writ petition regarding gratuity eligibility for municipal employees as infructuous following a Supreme Court ruling resolving the legal conflict on the applicable law, while granting liberty for future challenges.
What did the court decide?
Disposed of as infructuous; liberty granted to file separate writ petition against subsequent state notification.
What the court decided
CWP No. 15855 of 1995
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15855 of 1995 Date of Decision: 22.04.2010
Rattan Singh and others
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA
- 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
- Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ?
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition and the reference to the Full Bench are still maintainable after the issue was resolved by the Supreme Court.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to challenge subsequent notifications by way of a separate writ petition.
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ challenging state notifications.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rattan Singh
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Mukul Mudgal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/15855/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court