The High Court dismissed a Criminal Writ Petition for want of prosecution after noting the petitioner's absence and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Writ Petition No.625 of 2010 Date of Decision 21.04.2010
Rajesh
...... Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
...... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents-State.
A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):
Despite several calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that he is no more interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
mamta-II
21.04.2010
Rajesh
State of Haryana
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
