Petitioner challenged transfer order along with an earlier one and a settlement letter. Court found the petitioner was superannuated, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Order disposed accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to petitioner's superannuation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.13855 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 19, 2010
Jaswant Singh
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
This petition is directed against order of transfer of the petitioner vide Order dated 26.7.2010 (Annexure P-4).
Learned counsel for the respondentState contends that the petitioner has already been superannuated and therefore, the case has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as infructuous.
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 19, 2010 JUDGE
avin
Jaswant Singh
State of Punjab
Ajai Lamba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
