receipt of application was 10.1.2007 in the office of the Commission. Obviously, this certificate was not in existence as on the last date for receipt of application and thus could not have been produced alongwith the application. Even if the contention of the petitioner is accepted that he was not under obligation to produce the experience certificate alongwith the application, the experience certificate relied upon by the petitioner (Annexure P-6) cannot be accepted as the same has been issued by the Er.Subhash Saini registered with M.C.Design Home Architect Engineer Valuer Planner Surveyor and Estimator wherein it is stated that the petitioner has worked with him from Jan.2004 to 10.4.2007. No specific date of joining the job has been mentioned. Under the advertisement, three years experience was required as on the last date for making application. In the absence of clear date of experience, it cannot be said with certainty that the petitioner was possessed of requisite three years experience as on the date of making application. In view of the above circumstances, no benefit can be granted to the petitioner, even if it is accepted that he could have produced the certificate on the date of interview. In this view of the matter, I find no ground to interfere with the selection of respondent no.4. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
