The petitioner, seeking admission to studies after a 21-year gap, challenged the University's decision. The Court held the University's approach was not unfair as it relied on a university ordinance. The writ petition was dismissed as no case for interference was established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 10183 of 2009
Date of decision : 03.08.2010
Harmesh Chander
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Guru Nanak Dev University and another
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The justification given in the reply is that the petitioner is wanting to continue with the studies after 21 years gap. The approach adopted by the University does not suffer from any unfairness and it is on the basis of ordinance promulgated by the University. No case for interference, therefore, is made out.
Dismissed.
August 03, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the University's approach regarding the petitioner's admission after a 21-year gap was unfair or contrary to the promulgated ordinance.
Whether a case for judicial interference in the University's admission decision was made out.
Harmesh Chander
Guru Nanak Dev University
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
