Petitioner sought parole via an application but counsel withdrew the petition albeit with liberty to pursue the application. The court dismissed the petition as it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-7212 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : 10.03.2010
Pardeep @ Kala
... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the application dated 5.3.2010 (Annexure P-3), filed by him for grant of parole.
Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
March 10, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Pardeep @ Kala
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
