Raj Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
What did the court decide?
Petition withdrawn with liberty to approach authorities for parole consideration in accordance with law.
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
Petition withdrawn with liberty to approach authorities for parole consideration in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-4957 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : 08.03.2010
Raj Kumar
... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Mr. Surender Deswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the authorities for considering his claim for parole, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
March 08, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Raj Kumar
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Jora Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court