Rajbala v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment considers a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail in anIPC offence. After state counsel noted the petitioner no longer requires custodial interrogation, the court made the interim order dated 12.11.2010 absolute subject to Section 438(2) conditions.
What did the court decide?
Interim order dated 12.11.2010 made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.