submitted that, the order, summoning the petitioners, is revisable, but, no revision, has been filed, against the same, before the Court of Sessions, and, as such, the petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is not maintainable. He further submitted that, the complainant/respondent No. 2, was securing his liberty, and, that was why, the complaint, was not filed, at that time, and, delay was caused. He further submitted that, the disputed questions of fact, cannot be adjudicated upon, in the proceedings, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., which are summary in nature. He further submitted that continuance of the complaint, the summoning order, and the subsequent proceedings, arising therefrom, are, thus, not the abuse of the process of the Court. 8. After giving my thoughtful consideration, to the rival contentions, raised by the Counsel for the parties, in my considered opinion, the petition, is liable to be accepted, for the reasons, to be recorded, hereinafter. Section 482 Cr.P.C., vests the Court with wide powers, to prevent injustice, and to do substantial justice. If the Court, is of the opinion that, on account of continuance of particular criminal proceedings, injustice shall occasion, to the petitioners, and the same, are nothing but an abuse of the process of the Court, then, power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., can be exercised. Admittedly, FIR No. 06 dated 08.01.05, under Sections 307, 323, 325, and, 342 read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Adampur, with regard to the occurrence, which took place, on 05.01.05, was registered, on the basis of the statement of Garib Dass, complainant (now petitioner No. 1), on the allegations, that at about 7.30 PM, on
