them. During the course of his cross-examination, Parveen Kumar, Sub Inspector, PW5, also stated, that it was Surinder Singh, Head Constable, who identified Ram Piara and Dyal, accused, while running away. Parsa Singh, Inspector, PW3, stated that, he knew Ram Piara and Dyal, accused, earlier, and, thus, he identified them. During the course of his cross-examination, Parsa Ram, Inspector, PW3, stated that, when Ram Piara, ran away, the Police party, was at a distance of 3-4 karams. He further stated that, Ram Piara and Dyal, accused, belonged to village Sahota, which is at a distance of 1 km, from the place of recovery. He did not state even a single word, as to how, he knew Ram Piara and Dyal, accused, earlier to the alleged recovery. He did not state, even a single word, that he had registered cases, against them, earlier to the present recovery, and that was why, he identified them, at the spot. He did not state, even a single word, in his statement, that both these accused, were witnesses, in some other cases, which had been investigated by him. He did not state, even a single word, that these accused, used to come, to the Police Station, in connection with the work of other villagers, and that was why, he knew them. There was no source of light, at the site, when both these accused, allegedly ran away, from the spot. No identification parade, whatsoever, was held, by Parsa Singh, Inspector, PW3, during the course of investigation, to pin-point the identity of the accused. Both these accused, were arrested much later. Surinder Singh, Head Constable, PW7, during the course of his cross-examination, stated that, he did not
