wide powers, to prevent injustice and to grant substantial justice, yet it is not, in each and every case, in which the criminal offences are non-compoundable, as envisaged under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings, arising therefrom, should be quashed. This Court, while exercising the power, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is required to take into consideration the nature of the criminal offences, allegedly committed by the accused-petitioners. If, in such like cases, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings, are quashed, then there will be complete lawlessness in the society and the life and liberty of the citizens would be jeopardized. Even otherwise, it is settled principle of law, that when there is a specific provision to the contrary, then the provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked. In Kulwinder Singh's case (supra) the Full Bench of this Court, never held that, in each and every case, wherein, the offences are non-compoundable, the Court must exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR and the subsequent proceedings. A caution was struck, in that case, that the Court while exercising the power, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is required to take into consideration the nature of the criminal offences, committed by the accused. No invariable principle of law, was laid down,
