The High Court, Ahmedabad, records an oral order where Counsel withdraws a petition to enable the appellant to approach the Court of Sessions Judge with a condonation of delay application, leading to dismissal with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 307-MA of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.10.2010
Sat Pal Singh Malhotra
...Appellant
versus
Gulshan Kumar
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Abhishek Sethi, Advocate for the appellant.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the appellant to avail his appropriate remedy before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) October 25, 2010 Judge naresh.k
Sat Pal Singh Malhotra
Gulshan Kumar
Mehender Singh Sullan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
