The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn after the learned counsel for the petitioners indicated they did not wish to press the matter at that stage.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-20046 of 2010 Date of decision : 15.10.2010
Sarabjit Kaur and another
...Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
What is not disputed before me is that the civil suit is pending for challenging the sale deed executed by petitioner No.2 in favour of one Bhupinder Singh.
In view of the reply filed by the State, learned counsel for the
petitioners does not want to press this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
October 15, 2010 naresh.k
Sarabjit Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
