Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. during trial in case under Sections 392 and 395 IPC. Petitioner moved to withdraw the petition, which the court dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-29755 of 2010
Date of Decision: 07.10.2010
Sombir
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. K.S. Malik-1, Advocate for the petitioner.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C for seeking regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.119 dated 02.04.2010 under Sections 392 and 395 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar during the pendency of the trial.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be
permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
07.10.2010 gurpreet
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sombir
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
