Petitioner's writ petition declared infructuous due to filing of written statement by the State. Court dismissed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 2511 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.10.2010
Jagdev Singh
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. K S Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. SPS Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous in view of written statement filed by
the State.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
October 07, 2010 mohan
Jagdev Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
