The High Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous petition (C.M.) as infructuous. The State counsel submitted that the petitioner had been released on bail by the trial court under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. during the pendency of the petition, a fact not contested by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-12822 of 2010
Date of decision : 05.07.2010
Kanwaljit Singh @ Kewal
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been released by the trial court in exercise of power under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. According to him, the petition has, thus, been rendered infructuous.
This fact is not controverted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
In view of above, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
July 05, 2010 Ajay
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
Kanwaljit Singh @ Kewal
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
