Proceeding dismissed as not pressed because the underlying suit was already decided by the trial court prior to this revision petition.
Petitioner allowed liberty to raise all points in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.5590 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.12.2010
Ranjit Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
Charanjit Kaur and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present: - Mr. Jasbir Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since suit has already been decided by the learned trial Court during the pendency of this petition, hence this petition has been rendered infructuous. He states that same may be dismissed as not pressed.
Dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to raise
all the points in the appeal.
(Alok Singh)
Judge December 14, 2010 R.S.
Ranjit Kaur
Charanjit Kaur and others
Allok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
