Petitioners withdrew their revision petition in HC Punjab and Haryana. Court dismissed the petition with liberty to move fresh maintenance petition under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move fresh maintenance petition under Section 18 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.5468 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.12.2010
Neelam Goyal and another
....Petitioners
Versus
Sagar Goyal
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present: - Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a proper petition shall be moved under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act claiming maintenance from the respondent. He further states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Alok Singh) Judge
December 14, 2010 R.S.
Neelam Goyal and another
Sagar Goyal
Allok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
