J.S.Paul v. B.C.Birdi
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's application was dismissed as having become not pressed due to the matter being settled amicably, rendering the petition infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed.
What the court decided
C.R. No. 2700 of 2003
Lt. Col. J.S. Paul
vs.
B.C. Birdi
Present : Mr. Gagan Oberia, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Smarth Sagar, Advocate for Mr. Salil Sagar, Advocate None for the respondent
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter
has already been settled amicably, hence, petition has rendered infructuous and same be dismissed as not pressed.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
July 26, 2010 reena
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lt. Col. J.S. Paul
- respondent
B.C. Birdi
Coram
ALOK SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/2700/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court