Appeal by defendants against a decree for joint possession was dismissed for non-prosecution as it had been pending for over 22 years without appearance.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.290 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.11.2009
Teja Singh and others
-----Appellant
Vs.
Ajmer Singh
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present:- None.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
favour of plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 to 3 but the
RSA No.290 of 1987 (O&M)
2
defendants forged another Will dated 20.7.1981 to deny share of the property to the plaintiff.
relating to validity of Will dated 20.7.1981 set up by the defendants.
RSA No.290 of 1987 (O&M)
3
appellants.
November 12, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge
Teja Singh and others
Ajmer Singh
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
