The High Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution after a delay of over 22 years, noting the absence of the appellant and lack of a framed substantial question of law.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.250 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision:11.11.2009
M/s Raghunath Rai Naresh Kumar and Co.
-----Appellant
Vs. Tirlochan Singh Pritpal Singh and another
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present:- None.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
RSA No.250 of 1987 (O&M)
2
that no cloth was purchased on credit and nothing was due. 4. Main issue between the parties was Issue No.2. On the basis of agreement of the parties, the suit was partly
decreed. However, on appeal, the lower appellate court held that no agreement had been reached between the parties and decree of the trial court attributing consent to the defendants was against facts. Accordingly, decree of the trial court was set aside.
than 22 years. The appeal can be entertained only if there is any substantial question of law. No substantial question of
law has been framed.
matter was shown in the list earlier also.
November 11, 2009 ‘gs’
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
M/s Raghunath Rai Naresh Kumar and Co.
Tirlochan Singh Pritpal Singh and another
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
