Held an appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by the absent appellant appearing repeatedly despite repeated calls.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.236 of 1988 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.11.2009
Syndicate Bank
-----Appellant Vs. Shri Bansi Dhar and others
----Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present:- None.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
Bank against decree of the courts below dismissing its suit.
2 and 3 were sureties. Some payments were made but
amount of Rs.8815.65 remained outstanding.
RSA No.236 of 1988 (O&M)
2
November 12, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge
RSA No.236 of 1988 (O&M) 3
Syndicate Bank
Shri Bansi Dhar and others
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
