Appeal against a decree for recovery of goods was dismissed on the grounds of non-prosecution after the appellant failed to appear despite repeated notices.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.254 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision:11.11.2009
Charanjit Grover
-----Appellant
Vs.
Ballarpur Industries and others
----Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate for the respondents.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
decree of the courts below for recovery of Rs.35,945.99.
goods were supplied to the defendant and the amount in dispute was outstanding.
RSA No.254 of 1987 (O&M)
2
any substantial question of law. No substantial question of law has been framed.
November 11, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge
Charanjit Grover
Ballarpur Industries and others
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
