An appeal filed against the dismissal of a suit for more than 22 years was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant in court despite repeated calls, with no substantial question of law framed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.348 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.11.2009
Didar Singh
-----Appellant
Vs.
Charan Singh and others
----Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Present:None.
Adarsh Kumar Goel ,J.
RSA No.348 of 1987 (O&M)
2
for non-prosecution.
November 10, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge
Didar Singh
Charan Singh and others
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
