Single Bench allowed condonation of a 332-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The connected main appeal was disposed of based on a previous judgment.
Delay of 332 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No. of 4095 of 2008 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. of 4095 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: July 07, 2009
Joginder Singh
........ Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr.Sanjay S Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State
Mr. J P Bhat, Advocate for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate for respondent No. 2
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.
C.M. No. 8162 CI of 2008
This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 332 days in filing the appeal.
For the reasons recorded in the application and also keeping in view that similar connected appeals have already been disposed off, delay of 332 in filing the appeal is condoned.
C.M. stands disposed off.
Main case
It is agreed between the parties that the present appeal is squarely
RFA No. of 4095 of 2008 (O&M) -2-
covered by the judgement rendered by a Single Bench of this Court in the case 'Smt. Poonam v. State of Haryana and others', RFA No. 3008 of 2008, decided on 25.02.2009.
In view of the above, the instant appeal is also disposed off in the same terms as in RFA No. 3008 of 2008, referred to above.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
July 07, 2009 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 332 days in filing the appeal should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Joginder Singh
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
