Petitioners求求 were granted liberty to file a fresh petition. The present writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn yet with such liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.5862 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 20, 2009
Pradeep Kumar and others
.....PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.R.S. Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
April 20, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE
Pradeep Kumar and others
State of Punjab
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
