The petition, challenging an order, was dismissed by this Court as infructuous because the prayer had become inordinate no longer operative, without substantive analysis or reservation of questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 13364 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : 18.04.2009
Harjinder Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
Joint Registrar Cooperative Socieites, Patiala Division, Patiala and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. B.S. Sehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Counsel for the petitioner states that the prayer made in this
petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
April 18, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Harjinder Singh
Joint Registrar Cooperative Socieites, Patiala Division, Patiala and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
