Neelam Kumari and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition. No.17804 of 2007
Decided on : 22-07-2009
Neelam Kumari & another
.... Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab, Chandigarh & others
.... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL .
Present:Mr. BS Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. JS Puri, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 & 6.
Mr. Sekhar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Navjinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since
the petitioners have been re-employed on contract basis, therefore, the prayer made in this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
22nd July, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE
Neelam Kumari & another
State of Punjab, Chandigarh & others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court