Petitioner challenged non-issuance of posting order. Respondents withdrew appointment offer citing reliance on a fabricated document. Petitioner sought to withdraw petition, which was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.16709 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 12, 2009
Sukhjinder Pal Singh
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Plea made in this petition is to the effect that posting orders have not been issued although the petitioner has been selected and appointed.
Notice of motion.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy
Advocate General, Punjab, on the asking of the Court, accepts notice.
Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out from the original record that the petitioner had relied on a fabricated document to
CWP No.16709 of 2009 [2]
gain employment. The facts have come to the notice of the respondents and therefore, offer of appointment has been withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
wants to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 12, 2009 JUDGE
avin
Sukhjinder Pal Singh
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
