A writ petition challenging non-issuance of posting orders despite selection and appointment was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner accepted the offer withdrawal due to reliance on a fabricated document.
None; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.16702 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 12, 2009
Khairati Lal
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Plea made in this petition is to the effect that posting orders have not been issued although the petitioner has been selected and appointed.
Notice of motion.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the asking of the Court, accepts notice.
Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out from the original record that the petitioner had relied on a fabricated document to
CWP No.16702 of 2009 [2]
gain employment. The facts have come to the notice of the respondents and therefore, offer of appointment has been withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
wants to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 12, 2009 JUDGE
avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to appointment after selection?
Khairati Lal
State of Punjab & Others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
