The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed this writ petition for withdrawal filed by a retired petitioner with liberty to claim retirement benefits from the employer.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to claim retirement benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 1660 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : 15.04.2009
Navist Lal Gargi
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has
retired, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to claim the retiral benefits from his employer.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
April 15, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Navist Lal Gargi
State of Punjab
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
