Petitioner withdrew her writ petition seeking alternative remedy via school tribunal. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.2062 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 02, 2009
Vandana Sharma
.....PETITIONER
Versus
Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar and others
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Rajeev K.Kapila, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Aalok Jagga, Advocate, for Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G.,Punjab, for respondent No.3.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the respondents pointed out that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Punjab School Tribunal for the grouse raised in this petition. In view of the said fact, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Punjab School Tribunal.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
April 02, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE
Vandana Sharma
Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
