The petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition. The Court dismissed the petition but directed the trial Court to decide the case expeditively within six months.
The petitioner to withdraw the petition; the trial Court to expedite the trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-691 of 2009 Date of decision : 13.1.2009.
Charanjit Singh
................ Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate with Sh. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition. However, a request has been made to direct the trial Court to decide the case expeditiously.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial, preferably within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
( K.C. Puri ) 13.1.2009. Judge chug
Charanjit Singh
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
