Petitioner failed to file process fee and did not appear, leading the court to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-26851 of 2008 Date of decision : 12.1.2009.
Kuldeep Singh Brar
................ Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab an others
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: None for the petitioner.
Sh. K.S. Pannu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. From the perusal of the file, it is revealed that process fee has not been filed for summoning of the respondent for today, as well as, on the last date of hearing. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case.
So, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( K.C. Puri ) 12.1.2009. Judge chug
Kuldeep Singh Brar
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
