Dismissed
Anand v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/27897/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-27897 of 2008 Date of decision : 12.1.2009.
Anand
vs.
State of Haryana
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Sh. Neeraj Bhutani, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
As per allegation of the prosecution, a complaint was received that Sher Singh, Sarpanch, Anil, Dilbagh, Krishan, Sampat, Rani – Panches and Ranbir Singh, Gram Secretary, Block Rai, in collution with each other and in collusion with Pooja Building Material Supplier and Surya Building Material Supplier have embezzled an amount of Rs.3,80,90,000/-.
As per assessment made by the BDPO, Rs. 1,05,00,000/- has been stated to be paid to the petitioner for the purchase of material, but no material is stated to have been supplied to the Gram Panchayat. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail, as the custodial interrogation is required.
Consequently, the petition stands dismissed.
( K.C. Puri ) 12.1.2009. Judge chug
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail may be granted in a case alleging embezzlement where an amount of over one crore rupees was allegedly recovered and no material was supplied.
Anand
State of Haryana
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court