A criminal miscellaneous petition was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M-25009 of 2008 Date of decision : 9.1.2009.
Tulsi Ram Yadav
................ petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana and another
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Veneet Soni, Advocate for Sh. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Sh. Kulvir Narwal, Assistant Advocate General,
Haryana.
Sh. Sanjiv Kaushik, Standing counsel for respondent No.2. ...
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the
petition.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
( K.C. Puri ) 9.1.2009. Judge chug
Tulsi Ram Yadav
State of Haryana
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
