The court made the interim anticipatory bail order absolute. It is directed that the petitioner must abide by the conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition was disposed of.
Order dated 23.10.2009 made absolute; petitioner directed to abide by conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.53462 of 2009 and CRM-M-27601 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 17.11.2009
Mukhtiar Singh
. . . . Petitioner
VS.
State of Punjab
. . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Aminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 23.10.2009, petitioner has joined the investigation.
Learned counsel for the State/respondent, on instructions received from ASI Gurmeet Singh, admits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the above, order dated 23.10.2009 is hereby
made absolute.
It is directed that the petitioner shall abide by the conditions as envisaged by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Petition is disposed of.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
NOVEMBER 17, 2009 Vivek
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail order dated 23.10.2009 should be made absolute given that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukhtiar Singh
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
