Allowed
Suraj Kumar v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/25462/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-25462 of 2009 Date of decision:15.10.2009.
Suraj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND.
Present: Mr. J.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab.
S.D.ANAND, J.
It being common ground and is otherwise apparent from the Annexure P-1 that a co-accused of the petitioner has already been allowed regular bail by a Coordinate Bench (Mahesh Grover, J.) of this Court vide order dated 27.08.2009, this petition shall stand allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 15, 2009 vinod*
(S.D.ANAND) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
order dated 27.08.2009Referred¶3
Suraj Kumar
State of Punjab
S.D. ANAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court