The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition wherein counsel submitted that parties had entered a compromise and the petitioners did not wish to pursue the matter further.
The petition was disposed of based on the compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM . No. M 2201 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.03.2009
Smt.Vinita and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Tarunveer Vashist, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr.Ashwani Bura, Advocate for respondent Nos. 7 to 11.
Harbans Lal, J.
The learned counsel for the parties submits that the parties have entered into compromise. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that he does not wish to pursue this petition any further.
Disposed of accordingly.
March 2, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge
Smt. Vinita and another
State of Haryana and others
HARBANS LAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
