Petitioners sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition during final arguments. The court granted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M 23221 of 2008 Date of decision: 09.03.2009
Sonu Singh @ Sonu and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL
Present: Mr.Viney Puri, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Amit Kaushik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
Harbans Lal, J.
On instructions from Mian Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, learned State counsel informs that the case is fixed for final arguments. In view of this submission, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
March 09, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge
Sonu Singh @ Sonu and others
State of Haryana and another
Harbans Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
