Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition. Petitioner requested and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, to which certain respondents had no objection. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 18899 M of 2009 Date of decision: 15.01.2010
Tikaram
........ petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State
Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition.
Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3 has no
objection to the withdrawal of the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
15.01.2010 mohan
Tikaram
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
