Petitioner applied for regular bail but did not press the petition at the stage. Application dismissed as not pressed; trial Court directed to expedite.
Application dismissed as not pressed. Trial Court directed to expedite.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM No. M-14321 of 2009(O&M) Decided on:- 21.07.2009
Manoj Kumar ……Petitioner
Versus
State of U. T. Chandigarh …….Respondent
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri
Present Mr. ADS Sukhija Advocate for the petitioner. None for U. T. Chandigarh.
K. C. Puri, J.(Oral )
Petitioner-Manoj Kumar has moved an application for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.70 dated 1.2.2008,under Sections 306, 34 IPC, P. S. Mani Majra, Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is fixed for defence evidence and he does not want to press the petition, at this stage. Dismissed being not pressed.
However, trial Court is directed to expedite the trial Court.
July 21, 2009 ( K.C. Puri ) Mamta Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for regular bail that is not pressed should be admitted or dismissed.
Whether trial Court is directed to expedite proceedings.
Manoj Kumar
State of U. T. Chandigarh
K. C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
