Sandeep v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition at this stage. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
None; petition withdrawn.
The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition at this stage. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
None; petition withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-13751 of 2009(O&M) DECIDED ON:- 08.07.2009
Sandeep
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
......Respondent
Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri
Present Ms. Sharmila Sharma,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.
K. C. Puri, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the
petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
July 08, 2009 ( K. C. Puri ) mamta Judge
Sandeep
State of Haryana
K. C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court