The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance on three consecutive dates, including the date of hearing. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M. No. M- 11867 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 8.7.2009.
Amarjeet Singh
................ Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and others
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: None for the petitioner.
Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Sh.Vikram Singh, Advocate for Sh. Manu Bhandari, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6.
K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)
From the perusal of the file it is revealed that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates. Even today none has appeared for the petitioner.
So, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( K.C. Puri ) 8.7.2009. Judge chugh
Amarjeet Singh
State of Punjab
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
