Petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition upon assurance that an untraced report would be filed. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-1249 of 2009 Date of decision: May 18, 2009
Gurjit Singh
-Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & another
-Respondents
Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mrs. Sonia Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that an untraced report has been prepared in the instant case and the same is likely to be presented before the court of competent jurisdiction.
In view of the statement made by the State counsel, counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
[Rajan Gupta] Judge
May 18, 2009. 'ask'
Gurjit Singh
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
