The High Court at Chandigarh made the petition for anticipatory bail absolute, directing the petitioner to comply with investigation calls as per Section 438(2) CrPC, since she had already joined the investigation voluntarily.
Order dated 24.4.2009 made absolute; petitioner to join investigation as called and abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM.M-11154 of 2009 Decided on July 16,2009.
Sumitar Kaur --Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana --Respondent.
Present: Mr.N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG,Haryana.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 24.4.2009, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel on instructions from Baldev Singh, ASI.
In view of the above, the order dated 24.4.2009 is made absolute. The petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
The petition is disposed of.
July 16,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order granting anticipatory bail should be made absolute given the petitioner's voluntary joining of the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumitar Kaur
State of Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
