Petitioner seeks to withdraw CRM petition with liberty to present version to Investigating Officer. Court dismisses petition as withdrawn and directs IO to consider petitioner's version.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to present version before Investigating Officer; IO directed to consider petitioner's version.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No. M-10358 of 2009 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No. M-10358 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.5.2009
Vinod Kumar Bansal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to present his version before the Investigating Officer.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. It is directed that the Investigating Officer shall consider the version of the petitioner. In case the petitioner is still aggrieved, it will be open to him to avail of the remedy available to him under the law.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
May 07, 2009 'rajpal'
Vinod Kumar Bansal
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
