Petitioner challenged exclusion from police welfare fund as deceased employee made no contributions. Single judge dismissed the civil revision as no grounds to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 5761 of 2008
Date of decision: May 20, 2009
Pushpa Lata Saxena
.. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Kapoor, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
A.N. Jindal, J
Service book of the deceased Vandana Saxena has been summoned which shows that she has not contributed any amount towards the police welfare fund and as such, she was not member of the Punjab Police Welfare Fund.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
May 20, 2009 deepak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere when the deceased had no contribution to the police welfare fund.
Pushpa Lata Saxena
State of Punjab
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
