The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the revision petition as infructuous because the underlying application to vacate stay had already been decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 2002 of 2009 (O&M)
Date of decision: May 19, 2009
Deutsche Bank AG
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited
.. Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the respondent.
A.N. Jindal, J
Since the application for vacating the stay has already been decided, therefore, this revision petition having become infructuous is dismissed.
May 19, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Deutsche Bank AG
Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
