The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition held infructuous because the main suit had already been decided. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 5472 of 2005
Date of decision: May 20, 2009
J.S. Gill and others
.. Petitioners
Vs.
Dr. Vijay Bahadur
.. Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Arun Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
A.N. Jindal, J
Mr. Nehra has stated that the main suit stands already decided. In view of the fact, this revision petition having become infructuous is dismissed.
May 20, 2009 deepak
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
J.S. Gill and others
Dr. Vijay Bahadur
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
